Big Tobacco is Paying Social Media Influencers to Promote Their Products: Here’s How They Got Caught

Major tobacco companies have undergone large scale changes over the last decade, having to shift their research and development focus to smoking alternatives over the traditional combustible cigarette. Philip Morris International (PMI) even launched an advertising campaign this year with the tagline “We want to give up smoking.“ PMI claimed the ads were to promote their heat-not-burn and vape products, as the company hopes to make their cigarettes unavailable in the UK by 2030. Vaping and smoking alternatives outsell and outperform cigarettes in a number of areas, including current health research. But, PMI’s ad campaign was met with skepticism, and naturally considered a PR stunt.

Now, some 8 months later, it appears the public skepticism was warranted. Findings published online this week exposed social media advertising campaigns that promote cigarettes, funded and organized by major tobacco companies. Philip Morris International, British American Tobacco, Japan Tobacco International, and Imperial Brands were discovered using young-adult social media influencers to promote cigarettes on sites like Facebook and Instagram.

Social media posts like this on Instagram violate advertising laws across the globe. (photo from takeapart.org)

Found Out

The announcement followed a two-year investigation by the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids (CTFK) and Netnografica – a US-based online research company. The advocacy group included research findings in a petition filed with the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC). “Evidence from more than 40 countries reveals how these companies deceptively use social media channels to promote tobacco use and smoking to a near-unlimited audience of young people,” the petition claims. Advertising campaigns came from all over the globe, but use predominantly English messages and hashtags, prompting petitioners to claim that US youth were at least one of the intended audiences. The CTFK’s petition was cosigned by nine distinguished public health organizations, following Netnografica’s findings.

Netnografica surveyed over 100 influencers, who remained anonymous. Influencers said they were paid by the tobacco companies to promote cigarettes, including what hashtags to use, what messages to include in posts, how to look natural, and to keep their pay under wraps. Omitted sponsorship details may have been a corporate oversight – or even may have been slip ups by the influencers themselves, Influencers claiming that companies expressly told them not to say they were being paid comes across as more insidious or conscious, instead of simply forgetting a hashtag.

Time to Act

“The FTC should issue an order requiring the companies to disclose on social media platforms that their pictures, videos and hashtags are in fact paid advertising and endorsements by clearly including #Sponsored, #Promotion, or #Ad in the content,” petitioners demand. But, The FTC already revised its advertising guidelines, requesting companies and promoters include appropriate hashtags in their sponsored posts. The commission states “there are no civil penalties associated with them. But if advertisers don’t follow the guides, the FTC may decide to investigate whether the practices are unfair or deceptive under the FTC Act” on their site.

The World Health Organization (WHO) also composed a global treaty, called the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, obligating countries to ban all tobacco advertisement. The FTC and WHO regulations heavily influenced decisions by social media companies like Facebook and Instagram to build their own policies that ban adverts that promote cigarettes. Given the companies’ particular disregard for the FTC and WHO, hiding sponsorship with obscure hashtags instead of publicizing it with the obvious and required ones, a federal investigation may very well be forthcoming.

Further information on the issue and specific social media images related to the campaigns can be found at https://www.takeapart.org/wheretheressmoke/

Related Posts

An image depicting a bladder cancer tumor

Vapers May Be at Higher Risk for Bladder Cancer

A new bladder cancer study reveals that vapers may be at elevated risk compared to non-smokers and never vapers. Specifically, vaping and bladder cancer may be linked, although smokers too are already known to be at risk. Scientists conducting a recent meta-analysis of multiple research studies identified six substances strongly linked to bladder cancer in

Read More »
a woman looks afraid, holding her face, maybe as she experiences temporary psychiatric symptoms like paranoia

Cannabis Linked With Temporary Psychiatric Symptoms

Millions use cannabis worldwide, both recreationally and medically. New research, however, links temporary psychiatric symptoms and cannabis use, even for first time users. This suggests we should see the benefits and risks of cannabis use as a nuanced debate—one that depends in part on the active compounds in the particular cannabis used. Temporary Psychiatric Symptoms A

Read More »
JUUL vape with nicotine vape pods

Young Adults Don’t Always Know What’s In Their Vape Pods

According to new research from a Stanford University team, young adults often don’t know what’s in their nicotine vape pods, including what brand they use. Pod-based e-cigarettes look a lot like thumb drives, but they are vaping devices. They consist of a vaporizer base powered by a rechargeable battery, and vape pods that you snap

Read More »
Scroll to Top